tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3847211149012008703.post6838971700229859674..comments2023-11-03T04:50:42.128-05:00Comments on Confessional Gadfly: How Heresy and Error happensRev. Eric J Brownhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17747919365522145094noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3847211149012008703.post-15026073558271790422011-06-21T22:24:49.313-05:002011-06-21T22:24:49.313-05:00It was a leading question. That's why I calle...It was a leading question. That's why I called it a logical fallacy. It set you up to take one side or the other when the truth is neither option.<br /><br />But your little imprecision has proven your point on another position that you push on this blog. This is a perfectly good reason why philisophical reasoning (even when informed by the Biblical narrative) is inferior to just returning to the text. This is a classic case of a philisophical answer when a scriptural answer was needed. This is a classic case where human reason and natural law fall short.<br /><br />You'll see that the first response to the question was a reasoned response with man-made arguements. ...and it was wrong.<br /><br />The second response to the question returned to Scripture and St. Paul and quoted the apostolic teaching. ...and it corrected both errors simultaniously. So that it was not I who sharpened Rev. Brown but the Holy Spirit through the Divine Word.<br /><br />Thanks for showing us this great difference between man-made arguements and declaring the Word as it has been given to the church through all ages to proclaim.<br /><br />So even your mistakes prove you right in their own little way! I'm sure that you did this on purpose. ;)Mike Bakerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09202275259518132834noreply@blogger.com